Can you afford to launch without a thorough check of your smart contracts and platform?
We help companies ship with confidence by providing a comprehensive dapp security audit tailored to your project’s codebase and architecture.
Our team of 60+ engineers and 180+ ecosystem partners has completed 1,500+ smart contract audits and found 4,000+ vulnerabilities. We combine manual review and advanced tooling to catch issues early, which reduces breach costs and protects private keys.
As a guardian partner, we align scope with your business goals and prioritize findings by severity. A dedicated engagement lead keeps your team informed from kickoff through remediation, so fixes are actionable and predictable.
By investing in a proactive review now, you strengthen user trust and minimize the chance of costly incidents later. We translate technical findings into clear tasks so your engineers can move fast and safely on any major blockchain.
Key Takeaways
- We deliver focused reviews that match your product and threat model.
- Proven track record: 1,500+ audits and 4,000+ identified issues.
- Combination of human expertise and advanced tools improves detection.
- Engagement leads ensure clear communication and timely remediation.
- Early investment reduces incident costs and strengthens market trust.
Protect Your Decentralized Applications with a Proven dApp Security Audit Service
Our team performs a focused review to confirm your decentralized application behaves as intended and meets industry standards.
We align your project to accepted standards and practices by examining code, logic, and architecture. Review combines manual inspection with automated tooling so we catch issues tools alone can miss.
Protecting funds and user data is central to our work. We test key management, permissions, and transaction flows that affect users directly.
Our approach in brief
- Standards alignment: mapping code and design to real-world attack patterns.
- Hybrid review: manual analysis plus automated scans for broad coverage.
- Actionable remediation: clear fix guidance so engineers move quickly.
- Business logic checks: oracles, access control, and signature handling.
| Scope | Focus | Outcome | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code & libraries | Vulnerabilities & dependencies | Patched issues, safer deploys | 3–10 days intake |
| Architecture | Design patterns & flows | Defensible posture for partners | 5–15 days review |
| Business logic | Oracles, limits, permissions | Reduced systemic risks | 2–7 days verification |
Why dApp Security Matters Now: Risks, Losses, and Threat Landscape
High-profile thefts and systemic exploits have made defensive reviews essential for any live blockchain project.
Across DeFi, attackers extracted roughly $5.9B in total value. In 2023, about $1.9B was stolen from crypto projects. More than a dozen applications suffered incidents exceeding $100M.
These incidents stem from a few recurring vulnerabilities. Common vectors include logic flaws in pricing and rewards, misconfigured access control that allows privilege escalation, cross-chain bridge weaknesses, and private key leakage.
- Immediate loss of funds and operational disruption.
- Reputational damage that drives user churn and partner pullback.
- Heightened regulatory scrutiny and compliance costs.
| Threat | Typical Impact | Mitigation Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Logic flaws | Incorrect settlements, drained funds | Code review, transaction validation |
| Access control failures | Unauthorized admin actions | Least privilege, role testing |
| Cross-chain bridges | Expanded trust and exploit surface | Protocol verification, end-to-end tests |
| Key leakage | Impersonation, asset theft | Secrets management, key rotation |
We frame findings so executives can weigh operational and financial impact. Our reviews and follow-up recommendations help teams reduce cascading failures and sustain resilience as the platform grows.
Who Needs a dApp Audit? Wallets, Bridges, and Complex Architectures
Projects that manage keys, transfer value, or accept signed messages should plan a focused review early in development.
We advise teams that custody assets, bridge value between networks, or react to on-chain events to prioritize evaluation. These systems combine on-chain logic with off-chain services and carry elevated security risks for users and funds.
Wallets and custody flows
Wallets with custody features need stringent reviews because key handling, transaction authorization, and recovery flows affect user assets directly.
Cross-chain bridges and messaging
Bridges and messaging layers create complex trust boundaries. We validate message formats, consensus assumptions, and retry/replay defenses to prevent loss across the network.
Event-driven applications and signing
Any decentralized application that reacts to chain events must validate inputs, handle reorgs, and guard against front-running. Message signing for auth or approvals requires checks against malleability and misuse.
- We examine integrations and off-chain APIs to find hidden attack paths.
- Architecture reviews include threat modeling for services that influence on-chain outcomes.
- Code checks focus on permissioning, rate limits, and fail-safes to reduce escalation.
Outcome: a prioritized plan to reduce security risks across core components and peripherals, with clear remediation steps your engineers can follow.
When to Schedule Your Audit for Maximum Risk Reduction
Plan reviews around key milestones so risks are caught before they affect users.
We recommend several triggers for a timely review. Schedule an assessment before product release to validate readiness and avoid late-stage surprises that can derail your project timeline.
Re-audit after major code changes or architecture refactors so new logic does not reintroduce prior weaknesses. Do the same when upstream protocols prepare for upgrades to confirm compatibility and prevent cascading failures.
If you notice suspicious activity, treat it as a signal to engage us immediately. Rapid scoping helps contain exposure and guide mitigation steps.
- Establish a cadence tied to releases so security evolves with features.
- We map change-sets to risk areas and recommend the right review depth.
- Post-remediation re-checks confirm fixes and surface side effects.
- Clear milestones and timelines reduce disruption for engineering teams.
Proactive scheduling reduces operational risk while accelerating safe delivery of new capabilities. We work with your stakeholders to align windows, priorities, and minimal downtime.
dapp security audit: Our End-to-End Methodology
From intake to certification, our workflow turns complexity into actionable milestones.
We begin with scope definition and a documentation intake. You submit design docs, manifests, and contract code. Within 3–10 days we return a scope, timeline, and price estimate.
Next, our engineers run a combined manual review and automated tooling sweep. We analyze code, business logic, contracts, and architecture to find functional and implementation issues.
Threat modeling and standards alignment
We map plausible attack paths and test real-world scenarios. Then we compare your implementation to accepted standards and practices. This step highlights gaps and practical improvements.
Reporting, remediation, and certification
We deliver a private report with prioritized issues, evidence, and remediation guidance. We work with your engineers to clarify fixes and verify edge cases.
After fixes, we perform a re-check. Successful remediation leads to certification and optional promotion to bolster market trust.
| Phase | Deliverable | Typical Time |
|---|---|---|
| Intake & scoping | Scope, timeline, price estimate | 3–10 days |
| Review | Manual + tooling findings (code, logic, architecture) | 10–20 business days |
| Report & remediation | Private report, fixes, re-check | Variable; re-audit after fixes |
| Certification | Verification & promotion kit | Post-remediation |
- We keep a predictable communication cadence and status updates.
- Our report prioritizes issues so teams can remediate efficiently.
- Average completion ranges from ten to twenty business days depending on scope.
What You Get: Deliverables and the Audit Report
We deliver a clear, actionable report that aligns technical findings with business priorities.
Our final package maps each finding to impact and remediation steps. The report contains a prioritized catalog of issues and vulnerabilities, with severity, affected components, and step-by-step recommendations.
Comprehensive issue list
Actionable findings: every entry includes reproduction steps, affected contracts or code, and guidance to fix safely. We document assumptions and constraints so fixes fit your operational realities.
Numerical scoring and benchmarks
We provide scores for security, code quality, and documentation. These metrics let you benchmark progress and measure improvement over time.
System overview and context
The system summary explains architecture, trust boundaries, and overall risk posture in plain terms for engineers and executives.
- Code snippets and configuration guidance to speed remediation.
- Appendices with test coverage, tooling used, and monitoring recommendations.
- Structured to support compliance evidence and stakeholder communication.
Timelines and Engagement: From Kickoff to Certification
Delivering timely results requires a disciplined plan from kickoff through certification.
Most engagements complete within 10–20 business days. Exact timing is set during scoping and confirmed at kickoff so your release plan stays predictable.
We establish weekly touchpoints (or more frequent checkpoints) to align with your engineering team’s sprint cycles. The engagement lead coordinates communications and preserves context across time zones.
Typical cadence and client collaboration
Our project management resolves questions quickly to reduce idle time. Status updates track findings, remediation progress, and blockers that could affect delivery dates.
- We escalate critical findings immediately to limit exposure while the review is in flight.
- Re-check windows are scheduled after fixes to validate results without blocking releases.
- Upon completion, we deliver certification materials and a concise executive summary to support approvals and announcements.
Clients report prompt communication and smooth handoffs. Our company’s operational discipline keeps overhead low and improves predictability for your projects and services.
Penetration Test vs dApp Audit: What’s the Difference?
A focused code review finds design defects; an adversary simulation tests how systems behave under pressure.
We separate two complementary services so teams pick the right coverage for risk reduction. A formal audit targets code and architecture to locate implementation flaws before deployment. It maps trust boundaries and points to fixes developers can apply.
By contrast, a penetration test simulates real-world attacks across the application, infrastructure, and users. Testers emulate adversaries to reveal how controls fail under active threats and to validate detection and response.
- Design checks: find logic errors and unsafe patterns early.
- Adversary simulations: exercise runtime defenses and operational gaps.
- We help teams choose one approach or combine both for layered coverage.
| Focus | Primary Goal | When to Run | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code & architecture | Identify defects before release | Pre-launch or major refactor | Remediation plan, safer design |
| Penetration testing | Validate defenses under attack | After deploy or for compliance | Operational fixes, detection checks |
| Combined approach | Design + runtime assurance | High-risk systems and users | Defensible posture, prioritized work |
Executive summaries we produce explain differences in plain terms and recommend next steps to mature testing. This helps decision-makers weigh trade-offs and fund the right work for the system.
Transparent Pricing and How We Estimate Your Audit
We present clear, upfront pricing so teams know cost and scope before work begins.
How we estimate — after a short documentation intake we analyze codebase size, protocol complexity, third‑party integrations, and documentation quality. This lets us produce a fixed-scope proposal that lists deliverables, timelines, and pricing.
Key factors we consider
- Code volume and language mix (affects review time).
- Protocol complexity and cross-chain integrations.
- Completeness of docs and test coverage (reduces uncertainty).
- Third‑party services and vendor boundaries.
No hidden fees — clear commitments
We outline assumptions, constraints, and optional extras up front. Pricing can include re-checks and certification to cover the full remediation cycle.
| Estimate Element | What it Affects | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Codebase size | Review duration | Fixed-scope price |
| Protocol complexity | Expertise required | Matched team |
| Documentation & tests | Uncertainty & cost | Optimized timeline |
Our promise: a single point of contact, coordination with your vendors where needed, and clear updates if your applications evolve before kickoff. We favor clarity to build trust and streamline procurement for your company.
Why Choose Our Security Team
We deliver measurable protection, deep expertise, and responsive support so teams launch and operate with confidence.
Our track record is clear: 1,500+ smart contract audits and over 4,000 vulnerabilities) identified across diverse projects. That experience powers fast, accurate findings and realistic remediation plans.
We maintain a global bench of 60+ top-class engineers and collaborate with 180+ ecosystem partners. This scale lets us match reviewers to your protocol, contract patterns, and tech stack.
Trusted by leading organizations
Industry leaders such as CoinGecko, Binance, Aurora, Gate.io, VeChain, EBSI, Wemade, IoTeX, Status, and PAID Network rely on our work. That public trust supports verifiable credibility for your project.
Client-first process and post-engagement support
- Rapid, clear communication with a single engagement lead.
- Post-review verification to confirm fixes and safe rollouts.
- Tailored reviewer selection to reduce time-to-value.
| Capability | What it Delivers | Why it Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Depth of experience | 1,500+ audits; 4,000+ findings | Faster triage and accurate prioritization |
| Team & partners | 60+ engineers; 180+ partners | Scalable expertise for complex work |
| Client care | Engagement lead; post-fix verification | Reliable delivery and reduced launch risk |
To learn how we tailor reviews for your codebase, see our guide on enhancing dapp security.
Related Web3 Security Services to Strengthen Your Stack
A layered set of services helps teams harden protocol logic and operational proofs.
We offer three complementary service lines that reinforce one another. Each is scoped to measurable goals so teams can prioritize effort against roadmap impact.
Smart contract audits for protocol and DeFi logic
Four-stage smart contract reviews validate protocol flows, token mechanics, and governance rules. We test upgrade paths, reentrancy protections, and economic logic to protect core value movements.
Proof of Reserves for exchange transparency
Independent Proof of Reserves engagements provide observable, verifiable backing for custodians and exchanges. This builds user trust and supports regulatory conversations with clear attestations.
Blockchain protocol audits across architecture and implementation
Protocol audits examine consensus, networking, and client behavior. We map design assumptions to implementation and report cross-layer findings that affect both nodes and on-chain contracts.
- We integrate findings so fixes at one layer reinforce others.
- Reviewers map interdependencies and surface cross-service recommendations.
- Reports prioritize work where the security payoff is highest for your roadmap.
- Combined engagements scale with growth and evolving threat models.
| Service | Primary Focus | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Smart contract audits | Protocol & DeFi logic | Safer contracts and governance |
| Proof of Reserves | Asset transparency | Public trust & compliance evidence |
| Protocol audits | Consensus & client implementation | Resilient network behavior |
Clear scoping aligns each engagement with business objectives and measurable deliverables. Combined workstreams reduce duplication and deliver broader coverage for complex platforms.
Serving U.S. Teams: Compliance-Ready, Time-Zone Aligned, Outcome-Focused
We organize engagements to match U.S. business hours and enterprise reporting needs.
Our approach delivers predictable schedules, clear documentation, and rapid responses. We support U.S.-based teams with named contacts for security, engineering, and program management to keep work moving across a six-hour difference.
Deliverables are formatted for both technical and non-technical leaders. We align reviews to relevant standards and provide artifacts that satisfy internal compliance, audit trails, and executive reporting.
- Predictable schedules and high-velocity response times for clients.
- Remediation guidance tuned to regulated markets and partner reviews on your network perimeter.
- Phased rollout planning to reduce risk while meeting business deadlines.
- Post-engagement support for board updates, due diligence, and follow-on requests.
| Focus | What we provide | Typical outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Coordination | Named contacts, aligned meetings | Minimal handoff friction |
| Compliance | Standards-aligned artifacts | Audit-ready evidence |
| Delivery | Executive & technical summaries | Faster decision cycles |
Clients in the industry praise our organized delivery and cross-time-zone collaboration. Our team remains available after the engagement to assist with follow-up audits and to keep operations resilient.
Conclusion
A focused validation converts complex code risks into measurable trust signals for partners.
, We deliver a pragmatic dapp security audit that turns findings into prioritized fixes. Reviews typically finish in 10–20 business days, with re-checks, certification, and optional promotion after remediation.
Our methodology surfaces code and architecture issues that automated tools miss. You receive a clear report with step-by-step recommendations to protect funds, assets, and users on the blockchain.
With 1,500+ smart contract audits, 4,000+ discovered vulnerabilities, and a network of 60+ engineers and 180+ partners, we help teams prove readiness and reduce risk. Speak with us to scope your dapp review and begin hardening your contracts and applications for production use.
FAQ
What does a dApp security audit cover?
We review smart contracts, off-chain components, and system architecture to identify logic flaws, access-control issues, and integration risks. Our process combines manual code review, automated analysis, and threat modeling to produce actionable recommendations that protect funds, user data, and platform integrity.
When should we schedule an audit for best protection?
Schedule an assessment before launch or major releases, and again after significant changes to core logic or integrations. We also recommend an immediate review if you detect suspicious activity or new threat patterns impacting the ecosystem.
How long does a typical engagement take?
Most projects complete within 10–20 business days depending on scope. Initial scoping and documentation intake usually take 3–10 days, followed by review, remediation support, and optional re-audit for certification.
What deliverables do you provide?
The report lists discovered vulnerabilities with severity, impact, and remediation steps. We include a numerical security score, code-quality metrics, and a system overview summarizing architecture and overall risk posture.
How do you estimate pricing for an audit?
Pricing depends on codebase size, protocol complexity, number of integrations, and documentation quality. We provide a clear scope and cost upfront with no hidden fees and a transparent breakdown of services.
How is a penetration test different from a full dApp review?
A penetration test simulates real-world attacks across users, infrastructure, and app surfaces. A full review emphasizes code and architecture analysis, standards alignment, and design-level threat modeling. We offer both services and can combine them for comprehensive protection.
Which projects need this type of review?
Wallets, custody flows, cross-chain bridges, messaging layers, and any application reacting to on-chain events or using message signing should be prioritized. Complex architectures handling funds or keys require deeper scrutiny.
What are the common vulnerabilities you find?
Frequent issues include logic errors, improper access controls, reentrancy, unsafe external calls, key leakage, and cross-chain synchronization bugs. We also flag gaps in documentation and operational practices that raise the risk profile.
Do you support remediation and re-audit?
Yes. We provide remediation guidance, collaborate with your engineering team during fixes, and perform re-audits to confirm issues are resolved before issuing certification and promotional assets.
How do you ensure compliance for U.S. teams?
We align assessments with relevant industry standards and regulatory expectations, offer time-zone aligned communication, and deliver documentation suitable for compliance reviews and audits.
What makes your team different?
Our engineers combine deep protocol experience with a proven track record—thousands of assessments and discovered vulnerabilities—backed by ecosystem partners and long-term post-audit support focused on reducing operational risk and protecting assets.
