Can a single, focused review truly prevent costly failures and build lasting trust for your project?
We partner with teams to deliver a compact, transparent review that balances deep technical rigor with clear business guidance. Our approach blends manual review and automated checks to surface vulnerabilities and to keep operations running smoothly.
Backed by 1500+ completed smart contract audits and 4000+ identified vulnerabilities, our 60+ engineer team works across 180+ ecosystem partners. We cover Aptos and Sui and provide a predictable timeline of 5–15 business days with upfront pricing and no hidden fees.
We act as an extension of your internal team, translating technical findings into decision-ready recommendations for leaders and engineers. The result is a public certification badge and a clear remediation path that supports listings and enterprise reviews.
Key Takeaways
- We offer a concise, industry-recognized service with proven metrics and rapid delivery.
- Our team pairs hands-on execution with strategic guidance for business stakeholders.
- Coverage spans Aptos and Sui ecosystems with standardized methods and clear reports.
- Transparent pricing and predictable timelines help leadership plan releases.
- Deliverables include a public badge and actionable remediation for trust and listings.
Why Choose Our Move Blockchain Security Audit Services
Fast, thorough reviews from experienced engineers help projects gain market acceptance without delay.
We elevate trust, reduce risk, and accelerate listings by delivering a repeatable process that exchanges and aggregators recognize. Our team of 60+ engineers has completed 1500+ smart contract engagements and works with 180+ ecosystem partners to produce verifiable results.
Transparent pricing and time-efficient delivery ensure finance and engineering plan with confidence. Typical engagements take 5–15 business days with fees agreed before kickoff and no hidden costs.
- Recognized by CER, CoinGecko, and CoinMarketCap for external due diligence.
- Predictable milestones that align listings, marketing, and product launch.
- Actionable reports, a public certification badge, and artifacts for stakeholder verification.
| Feature | Benefit | Typical Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Engineer coverage | Depth and scale across many projects | 5–15 business days |
| Recognition | Faster access to listings and aggregators | Immediate on report issue |
| Pricing model | Budget certainty for leadership | Quoted before kickoff |
What Is Move and Why It Changes Smart Contract Security
Move rethinks how on-chain assets are modeled, shifting safety guarantees into the language itself.
At its core, Move is the primary language for smart contracts in the Aptos and Sui ecosystems. It introduces resource-oriented programming that treats assets as first-class resources. That design reduces many runtime errors by enforcing constraints at compile time.
Type and borrow checking in the language cut whole classes of memory and ownership bugs. Still, rigorous review is essential to validate business logic, access controls, and invariants.
- We explain how modules, abilities, and resource semantics map to safe on-chain functionality.
- Our reviews inspect logic flows, pre/post-conditions, and state transitions so functions cannot be abused to drain funds or bypass controls.
- We combine manual analysis with ecosystem tooling—Aptos and Sui analyzers, formatters, and the Move Web IDE—to speed coverage and reduce code smells.
Formal verification complements testing by proving properties like asset conservation. We document trust boundaries and note where external calls or privileged modules may introduce threats to your project.
The result is a clear mapping from language features to business guarantees, plus prioritized hardening opportunities that align with community standards and development best practices.
The Risk Landscape: DeFi Hacks, Flash Loans, and Emerging Threats
High-profile losses and fast-evolving exploit patterns force projects to treat risk assessment as continuous work, not a one-time checkbox.
Recent data make the case clear: DeFi has seen roughly $5.9B in total value hacked, crypto projects lost $1.9B in 2023, and flash loan attacks alone caused $275M in 2023.
These figures show how small logic errors can be amplified by atomic liquidity. Common attack vectors we track include reentrancy variants, price-oracle manipulation, privilege escalation, and pool math errors.
Risk extends beyond code. Operational misconfigurations, weak key handling, and slow disclosures increase impact on users and invite regulatory scrutiny.
- We convert incident reports into concrete controls at the contract level: preconditions, invariant checks, and robust failure modes.
- We evaluate cross-contract and cross-chain interactions to reveal subtle edge cases before they become high-impact events.
- Layered defenses combine on-chain safeguards, off-chain monitoring, and incident readiness to shorten time-to-containment.
Our approach prioritizes fixes by both incident frequency and blast radius, focusing on custody modules, bridge logic, and upgrade paths to reduce real-world losses for projects and users.
Who Needs a Move Smart Contract Audit and When to Engage
A targeted contract review protects users and business continuity when scheduled at the right times.
We work with DeFi protocols, DEXs, NFT and gaming platforms, wallets, and bridges to validate smart contracts before they handle real value or user keys.
Ideal engagement points include pre-deployment, during development, after code updates, upon suspicious activity, and before major listings.
- DeFi and DEXs: Independent review is a release prerequisite because concentrated funds magnify risk.
- NFTs and gaming: Token logic and marketplace functions need consistent checks to avoid cascade failures.
- Wallets and bridges: Reviews validate key handling, message verification, and state sync across chains or integrations.
We align scope to your applications and roadmap, confirm role permissions and access controls, and prioritize findings by exploitability. For integrations or forks, we focus on inherited risks so your project avoids upstream vulnerabilities.
The outcome is a clear plan that lets engineering and leadership sequence fixes for maximum protection and minimal disruption to users and operations.
Move Blockchain Security Audit: Our Proven Methodology
Our methodology begins with a focused intake that maps scope to business goals and technical constraints. We outline a clear audit process so stakeholders keep control and timelines are predictable.
Scoping and quotation aligned to your project goals
We start with a brief evaluation of codebase size, protocol design, and launch windows. This produces a firm quotation with no hidden fees.
Deep code review, logic validation, and security testing
Our review inspects modules, resource flows, and access control. Logic validation covers business rules, math, and state transitions to prevent manipulation or privilege misuse.
Testing blends manual inspection with tool-assisted scans to surface vulnerabilities across initialization, upgradeability, and external calls.
Formal verification and standards-driven assessment
Where warranted, we apply formal methods to prove high-value properties (for example, asset conservation). Assessments reference industry standards and security standards your stakeholders recognize.
Remediation guidance, re-audit, and certification
We deliver prioritized findings with exploit scenarios and step-by-step fixes. After remediation, we re-audit targeted areas, update the report, and offer certification plus optional promotion support.
- Contact → Evaluation → Get a quote
- Audit report → Remediation check → Certification
- Ongoing monitoring and periodic reviews
Deliverables You Can Act On
Every report we produce is built to turn discovery into concrete, executable work for your team.
Severity-based vulnerability classification
We classify findings by severity and exploitability. This ranking helps teams focus on the highest-impact vulnerabilities first.
Step-by-step remediation recommendations
Each issue includes reproduction steps, affected code references, and precise fixes. Engineers can apply changes faster and verify results.
Scoring across documentation, code, architecture, and security
We benchmark maturity with a transparent scoring model. Scores cover docs, code quality, architectural risk, and overall security posture.
Public audit report, certification badge, and promotion options
The final public report and certification badge strengthen credibility with exchanges and data platforms. Qualifying projects may access promotion channels to amplify launch reach.
| Deliverable | Contents | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Audit report | Severity list, repro steps, code refs | Faster remediation, clear priorities |
| Scoring | Docs, code, architecture, security | Benchmark progress and meeting standards |
| Certification & promotion | Public report, badge, outreach options | Trust signals for users and partners |
Technology, Tools, and Coverage Across the Move Ecosystem
Our toolchain combines analysis engines and IDEs to give teams fast, precise insights across Aptos and Sui.
We use proven tools such as Sui Move Analyzer, Aptos Move Analyzer, the Move Web IDE, and formatters to surface high-fidelity code issues quickly.
Automated scanners (including BitsLabAI Scanner, which placed highly in public competitions) accelerate checks. We pair their output with expert review to filter false positives and add context.
Ongoing monitoring and source verification
Source verification ensures deployed binaries match audited sources so partners and users can verify integrity.
- Move-aware static and dynamic checks evaluate resource usage and capability boundaries.
- Continuous monitoring catches regressions and dependency risks early.
- We deliver verification artifacts and monitoring recommendations so engineering teams can institutionalize best practices.
Technology enhances expertise. Our process scales from single modules to complex protocol suites, keeping controls consistent across the ecosystem and helping teams reduce real-world risk.
Timelines, Pricing, and Engagement Model Built for Speed
Clear fees and firm timelines remove surprises so engineering and leadership can plan with confidence.
Most engagements complete within 5–15 business days. That window gives product and marketing teams a dependable schedule for releases and listings.
We lock scope and pricing up front. This provides financial predictability and eliminates hidden fees.
Engagement cadence and scope control
Our process is milestone-driven with a clear step sequence. Teams see deliverables and dates from kickoff to final report.
- Scope control focuses effort on high-risk code paths tied to custody and authorization.
- Communication cadences match your sprint cycles to reduce context switching.
- We deliver interim observations so quick wins can be fixed before the final report.
| Feature | Benefit | Typical outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | Predictable timeline | 5–15 business days |
| Pricing | Upfront quote, no hidden fees | Budget certainty |
| Deliverables | Milestones, reports, artifacts | Faster remediation and handoff |
Our services scale from targeted reviews to full protocol suites. Standardized contract and artifact handoffs keep accountability clear across projects.
Proof of Expertise and Industry Recognition
Our track record translates technical rigor into measurable trust for teams and stakeholders.
We have completed 1500+ smart contract audits and discovered over 4000 vulnerabilities. A 60+ engineer team and 180+ ecosystem partners support complex work across protocols and integrations.
Thousands of engagements and verifiable outcomes
Audits produce actionable artifacts: a public audit report, remediation steps, and certification that markets recognize. In 2022, audited projects recorded zero hacks—an outcome that supports listings and user trust.
Recognition by leading platforms
Our work is acknowledged by CER, CoinGecko, and CoinMarketCap. Competitive results (BitsLabAI Scanner placing second in SuiDex) further validate our tooling and methods.
- Repeatable services that scale from early development to post-deployment monitoring.
- Consistent documentation and public artifacts for investors and partners.
- Business outcomes: better listings readiness and lower incident likelihood.
| Metric | Value | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Completed engagements | 1500+ | Proven, repeatable experience |
| Identified vulnerabilities | 4000+ | Refined detection and prevention |
| Team & partners | 60+ engineers, 180+ partners | Scale and specialized expertise |
Conclusion
Conclusion
We finish every engagement with a clear, milestone-driven plan that turns findings into fixes, certification, and launch readiness.
Our process moves from contact and quotation to a formal review, report delivery, remediation, and a report update. Optional monitoring keeps code resilient as functionality evolves.
Typical timelines run 5–15 business days, producing a recognized public report and a certification badge that helps with listings and partner reviews.
We validate contracts and critical functions so projects can protect users and treasury under real-world threats. Engage us for a tailored scope, fixed pricing, and a focused step plan that delivers measurable risk reduction and production-grade assurance.
FAQ
What services do you provide for Move smart contract security?
We deliver comprehensive smart contract review services tailored to Aptos and Sui ecosystems. Our work includes scoping, manual code review, automated testing, formal verification, and post-fix validation. We also offer monitoring, source verification, and guidance for secure deployment so teams can reduce risks and improve trust with users and listing partners.
When should a project engage your team for a smart contract review?
Engage us pre-deployment for the best risk mitigation, after major updates, before integration with other systems (wallets, bridges, or DEXs), or immediately following suspicious activity. Early reviews save cost and reduce the chance of high-severity incidents that damage reputation and funds.
How long does a typical review take and what affects timing?
Typical reviews take 5–15 business days depending on scope, codebase size, and required verification depth. Factors that affect timing include complexity (protocol logic, cross-contract calls), required formal proofs, and turnaround time for remediation from your developers.
What does your deliverable package include?
We provide a severity-based vulnerability classification, step-by-step remediation recommendations, a security score covering documentation, code, and architecture, and an optional public report and certification badge. Clients also receive re-audit validation after fixes.
How do you ensure findings are accurate and actionable?
We combine automated tools with manual expert review to validate logic, verify assumptions, and reproduce exploit scenarios. Every finding includes impact, exploitability, and clear remediation steps so engineering teams can implement fixes quickly and confidently.
Do you perform formal verification and standards-driven assessments?
Yes. For critical modules we apply formal methods and model checking to prove properties where feasible. We also assess compliance with industry standards and best practices to align contracts with secure design patterns.
How transparent is your pricing and engagement model?
We provide clear, scope-aligned quotes with no hidden fees. Pricing reflects project size, required depth (manual review vs. formal verification), and delivery speed. We can accommodate fixed-price or milestone-based engagements to match your budgeting needs.
Can you help with post-audit remediation and retesting?
Absolutely. We provide prioritized remediation guidance, work with your engineers on mitigations if requested, and perform re-testing to confirm fixes. Follow-up checks and continuous monitoring options are also available to maintain long-term integrity.
How do you handle confidentiality and access to source code?
We use secure channels and contractual NDAs to protect intellectual property. Access is limited to designated auditors, and we support audits from private repositories or supplied archives. Source verification and reproducible builds are part of our integrity checks.
What kinds of projects most often require your services?
We audit a wide range of projects including DeFi protocols, DEXs, NFT platforms, gaming contracts, wallets, and cross-chain bridges. Any application handling assets or user funds benefits from a structured review and continuous risk management.
How do you prioritize vulnerabilities in your reports?
Findings are ranked by severity (critical, high, medium, low) based on exploitability, potential financial impact, and attack surface. We include reproduction steps, suggested fixes, and time-to-fix estimates so teams can triage effectively.
Do you provide a public report and certification for completed audits?
Yes. Clients may publish a public report and receive a certification badge after remediation and re-validation. These deliverables help projects demonstrate transparency and build trust with users, exchanges, and integrators.
What tools and techniques do you use during reviews?
We use a mix of static analysis, symbolic execution, fuzzing, formal verification tools, and manual code inspection. Our approach targets logic flaws, reentrancy, access control, economic attacks (flash loans, oracle manipulation), and emergent threats specific to the ecosystem.
How do you stay up to date with evolving threats and standards?
Our team continuously researches incident postmortems, contributes to standards, and collaborates with ecosystem partners and data platforms. That ongoing work informs our methodology and keeps findings aligned with current adversary techniques.
What information do you need to start an engagement?
We need the code repository or artifact, interface specifications, design docs, threat model, test vectors, and deployment plans. Clear objectives and a point of contact accelerate scoping and ensure our review aligns with your project goals.
